Humne tumhe bachaya (we saved you)
Hamaare guruon ne tumhare Pandat bachaaye (Our Gurus saved your Pandits)
Hamaare Sikhon ne tumhari auraten bachaayin (Our Sikhs saved your women)
Hamaare Sikhon ne tumhaare Mandir bachaaye (Our Sikhs saved your temples)
Hindu apni ladaai khud nahi lad sakta tha, Sikhon ne unki ladaai ladi (Hindus couldn’t fight, Sikhs fought for them)
The ongoing ‘farmer protest’ has exposed everything that is wrong in country except farming. Yuvraj Singh’s father, a failed actor, Yograj Singh recently reminded us “how Hindu women were sold to Mughals in 2 Rupees and how Sikhs would save women of ‘weak Hindus'”. He is not alone. Gang of left joined ‘farmers’ with ‘free Umar Khalid’ posters. On 26 Jan, the gloves were off.
Who can’t see a genuine-looking farmer protest was vitiated with communal hatred for Hindus from Day one? ‘Farmers vs govt bill’ was deliberately made into ‘Sikhs vs India’ and ‘Sikhs vs Hindus’ thanks to celebrities, actors, dancers, politicians and Shaheen Bagh model.
When brothers fight, enemy ropes in. Pakistan – that came into being with declaration that Muslims & Hindus (including Sikhs) are two different races who can’t live together – is conducting 5 TV shows daily ‘in support of Sikh farmers’.
I am not the one who would blame Pakistan or Khalistanis sitting across world for the mess. I always believe outsiders can’t be the reason of fire. They can add fuel certainly. But cause is certainly deeper and internal. The ongoing ‘farmer protests’ mess or Sikh separatism in 1980s stemmed from same root that needs to be addressed now.
Distortion of history – root cause of Hindu-Sikh divide
In childhood, majority of Sikhs I knew were impossible to distinguish from Hindus except for physical appearance. I belong to a Punjabi Hindu family that migrated from Punjab to West UP few centuries ago. My family history shows some of my great grandmothers having surname ‘Kaur’ on both paternal and maternal sides. Even today, we have a Sikh married into our family. She is equally versed with history of Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Vedic Mantras. She performs Yajna-Agnihotra better than any trained Purohit.
I grew up in refugee colony in West UP with Hindu-Sikhs who were driven out of today’s Pakistan’s Punjab and settled here with whatever was left of their families and relations. Every household had horror stories to tell. No family came to India unharmed. Some lost most women, some lost elders, some lost all kids, some lost everything, and all lost pride.
I was surrounded with Sikhs who would visit Salasar Ji, Vaishno Devi and apply Tilak on forehead with pride on Diwali Puja. They would come back with Prasad and distribute in Muhalla. Most Sikh shopkeepers had framed images of Lakshmi Mata, Lord Krishna & Lord Ganesh along with Guru Nanak Ji placed in their mini-temple installed just above the Galla (cash corner).
On Diwali, each temple and Gurudwara of the city would illuminate with same joy & light. I had Sikh friends who would recite Hanuman Chalisa in single breath. I played Sahibzada Fateh Singh (son of Guru Gobind Singh) more than once in school drama. There was not a single dry eye when Wazir Khan bricked 5 yrs old kid alive for not converting to Islam.
In a nutshell, a significant chunk of Sikhs was inseparable from Hindus. They believed themselves to be part of common glorious heritage of Vedas, Ram and Krishna. They took pride in the fact that Sikhs were those courageous first sons of every Punjabi Hindu household whose brave mothers volunteered to give them for the Hindu (Khalsa) army against Islamic invaders.
However, there is another view among many Sikhs. Another significant fraction believes Sikhism is a separate religion. Not just separate but superior religion that rebelled against oppressive Hindu faith by
- Challenging Brahmanical hegemony
- Rejecting rituals like Janeu, Tilak, Yajna
- Eradicating caste-system
- Rejecting idol-worship
- Rejecting polytheism and establishing worship of One True Supreme (quality that makes Sikhs closer to Muslims than Hindus)
- Embracing secularism by declaring – I am neither Hindu nor Musalman
The view that Sikhs are separate religion gained prominence of late. Plethora of literature was fabricated and history was rewritten with sole aim to dissociate Sikhs/Sikhism from Hindu/Hinduism. Some claims were made out of thin air and were repeated. Books, tracts, articles, media forums were flooded with the recently fabricated history with impunity. I will give some examples of how Janeu and Yajna were wiped out from Sikh history.
Claim 1 : Guru Nanak rejected sacred thread (Janeu/Yajnopaveet) of Hinduism
Guru Nanak refused to wear Janeu when Brahman came to perform his Yajnopaveet Sanskaar (sacred thread ceremony). Guru said-
“The thread is spun of cotton, and Brahmin twists it; They kill a goat to eat and then ask one to wear [this thread]”
“The Brahmin throws not the sacred thread over his passions and lust for woman. Each morning is his face covered with shame. His feet and hands by the thread are not restrained; Nor his tongue and eyes. Unrestrained by the thread he moves along.” [Guru Granth Sahib]
Reality:
1. If I see someone cleaning his hands with pure water and putting them in mud next moment, I would definitely call him an idiot. I will say – “Cleaning hands is of no use if you put them in mud again“.
In the above, did I condemn cleaning hands or putting hands in mud? Which sane person can infer rejection of cleaning hands from this? Similarly, when Guru Nanak said – “you kill/eat animals, you lust after women, you discriminate among people and then wear Janeu”, how does one conclude that Guru rejected Janeu? He simply pointed out contradiction in people’s conduct. His problem was with killing/eating animals, lust, and discrimination. Problem was certainly not with Janeu.
The lie that Guru Nanak rejected Yajnopaveet/Janeu is spread by quoting half text. Guru did question the priest regarding the ritual. But what he did next must be read in words of none other than Dr Kirpal Singh, author of Janamsakhi Tradition (stories from Guru Nanak’s life), former Professor & Head – Punjab Historical Studies Department, Punjabi University, Patiala. He is an authority on Guru Nanak’s history and Janamsakhis. Here is the full version of Guru’s Janeu incident verbatim from Dr Kirpal’s book – Janamsakhi Tradition
Religious Ceremony: Yajnopavit of Guru Nanak
“When Guru Nanak grew up to be of nine years, his parents thought of performing the ceremony of Yajnopavit i.e. investing the child with the sacred thread called janeu. The pandit brought along a janeu made of cotton. As per the practice, then prevalent, a special area was earmarked for the ceremony. The ground was sanctified by smearing it with a paste of cow-dung mixed with mud. Nanak was made to sit there, and it was whispered in his ear that it was the religion of Brahmins and Khatris to wear janeu. The ceremony was complete and all the relations who had come to see it went back. However, all this did not leave any special impact on Guru Nanak’s mind. The Guru has explained thus the real janeu in one of his hymns:
Make compassion the cotton, contentment the yarn; Continence the knot and purity the twist; Such is the true sacred thread of the self Thou Brahmin-priest! Put this on me shouldst thou have it. This thread neither snaps nor is soiled; Neither burnt nor lost. Said Nanak : Blessed are the beings that around their neck put this… [Guru Granth Sahib]”
Image provided by Gyani Aan Singh Amratsari, Shri Gurudwara Singh Sabha, Haryana.
Credits – Gurunanak Dev University Punjab
Dr Kirpal further adds quotations from different Janamsakhis that prove Guru Nanak DID wear Janeu. He writes
“The Miharban and Mani Singh Janamsakhis say the ceremony of putting Janeu took place at the age of nine.. There is considerable difference of detail as regards the observance of his ceremony in the Janamsakhis of Miharban and Mani Singh. The latter refers to the performance by Kalu (Guru Nanak’s father) of a huge Yajna.. There are many details of janeu- ceremony, Gayatri mantras recited by Pandit Brij Nath.
Contrary to it, the former which is of much earlier date than the latter; mentions none of these details. The former version has been taken as correct. Mani Singh says that at the time of wearing Janeu Guru Nanak recited to the Pandit the hymn- ‘O Nanak! my body is a chariot and it has one charioteer’ whereas the Miharban version says that he recited the hymn– ‘Make compassion the cotton, and contentment the thread, continence the knot and truth the twist.’”
Reality is major Janamsakhis have covered Janeu/sacred thread ceremony of Guru Nanak with prominence. They differ in nitty-gritty of ceremony as to which Mantra was recited by Brahman/Guru Nanak and which food was served etc but all of them conclude that Janeu ceremony DID happen and Guru Nanak wore Janeu. There is ABSOLUTELY NO account of Guru Nanak not wearing Janeu in any authentic Janamsakhi. (All tall claims of Guru rejecting Janeu are only found on online forums like ‘SikhWiki and RaajKaregaKhalsa dot com’ that are anything but authentic)
On contrary, Guru Nanak explained true spirit of Yajnopaveet/Janeu behind the ritual which is to purify body, mind and Aatma. Threads of Janeu are symbols. Guru was absolutely spot on when he criticised Janeu being worn by wrongdoers, meat-eaters and womanisers. This only proves his love and devotion towards Janeu – Vedic symbol of purity. Don’t we have similar restrictions on wearing Janeu as per Shastras? Guru’s anger was on wrongdoings, hypocrisy and mindless ritualism and not on Janeu itself. That’s why he wore it after explaining the spirit behind. Similarly, lot of Brahman-bashing is done in name of Guru Nanak by separatists based on isolated half quotes. I will show in subsequent articles how on contrary Guru Nanak and Sikh Gurus loved and respected Vedas and Brahmans.
2. While opposing Janeu under influence of separatist bigotry and false history, the separatists forget to take away crux of entire episode. Guru’s message was – “Your Janeu is of no use if you eat meat, have lust for other women etc..”
What separatists remembered is – “Your Janeu is of no use” deliberately chopping off latter part. Instead of rejecting meat, lust and discrimination, they rejected Janeu. This is similar to rejecting habit of cleaning hands instead of habit of putting them in mud.
3. Guru Nanak’s question of mindless ritualism on Janeu is equally valid on Panj Kakars also. If Guru considered meat-eating, lust and discrimination as greatest sins that pollute and defeat pious purpose of Janeu, same would pollute and defeat pious purpose of Panj Kakars too. Have separatists – many of them being meat-eaters, having lust for women, having strong superiority complex of being Jatt, the worst kind of casteism (half of Punjabi songs/movies revolve around Jatta’s supermanship) – rejected Panj Kakaars just like they rejected Janeu? If rituals of Panj Kakaars are followed despite these possible misconducts, there is no reason why Sikhs shouldn’t wear Janeu.
4. Guru Nanak not just wore Janeu but also considered it, along with Shikha/Choti, as symbol of pious people, seekers and saints. Guru Granth Sahib (Asa Ghar 4 Mahla 1) says
ਖਲੜੀ ਖਪਰੀ ਲਕੜੀ ਚਮੜੀ ਸਿਖਾ ਸੂਤੁ ਧੋਤੀ ਕੀਨ੍ਹ੍ਹੀ ॥
ਤੂੰ ਸਾਹਿਬੁ ਹਉ ਸਾਂਗੀ ਤੇਰਾ ਪ੍ਰਣਵੈ ਨਾਨਕੁ ਜਾਤਿ ਕੈਸੀ ॥੪॥੧॥੩੩॥
खलड़ी खपरी लकड़ी चमड़ी सिखा सूतु धोती कीन्ही ॥
तूं साहिबु हउ सांगी तेरा प्रणवै नानकु जाति कैसी ॥४॥१॥३३॥
The yogis and the celibates live their disciplined lifestyle.. For Your sake, O Lord Master, they are imbued with love.. They raise (Shikha/Choti) their hair in tufts and wear (Yajnopaveet/Janeu) sacred threads and loin-cloths. You are the Lord Master, I am just Your puppet. Prays Nanak.. ||4||1||33||
Claim 2 : Guru Nanak rejected Seven Rounds (Saat Phera) ritual of Hinduism in marriage
Guru Nanak challenged all major rituals of Hinduism. To prove that rituals mean nothing, Guru Nanak went around sacred fire of Yajna 4 times instead of prescribed 7 times in his marriage. This proves that Guru Nanak didn’t follow Hinduism.
Reality:
1. This claim is an admission that Guru Nanak performed Yajna and married as per Vedic ritual! What do you call a person who wears Janeu, performs Yajna and takes Pheras around sacred fire? Don’t we call him Hindu?
2. This is a self-goal by separatist historians anyway. As per Paraskar Grihya Sutram – the ancient book of Vedic rituals, a Vedic wedding has only four Pheras not seven! Most Vedic weddings actually happen with four Pheras only! Separatist enthusiasts confused four Pheras (circumambulation around Yajna) with Saptapadi (7 steps in straight line, another ritual in wedding). Here is the proof [Kand 1, Kandika 7, page 85]
This only proves that Guru Nanak not just performed Vedic Yajna but also followed ritual of four Pheras perfectly as per Shastras!
3. Another thing to note is Yajna isn’t performed without wearing Janeu/Yajnopaveet. So if Guru Nanak performed Yajna no matter with 4 or 7 Pheras as accepted undisputedly, he must be wearing Janeu at that time! This again negates bogus claim regarding Guru Nanak rejecting Janeu in childhood!
4. Separatists argue that Guru Nanak was not a Hindu since he rejected symbols of Hinduism such as Janeu. This is false as established above. Even for argument’s sake if it’s true, he still performed Yajna at his marriage ceremony which proves beyond doubt that Guru Nanak was a follower of Vedic Dharma. He could have rejected Yajna just like Janeu. Why didn’t he? Clearly he followed Vedic Dharma.
Question is why have Sikhs stopped performing Yajna that Guru Nanak himself performed? If Sikhs don’t wear Janeu because Guru Nanak rejected (which he didn’t) it, why don’t Sikhs perform Yajna at marriage which Guru Nanak did? Why are we following Guru Nanak in parts? Is there any justification other than blind hate for the parent faith – Vedic Dharma?
Claim 3 : Guru Tegh Bahadur saved faith of weak Hindus. It’s duty of Sikhs to protect weak. That doesn’t make him/Sikhs Hindu
Reality : Guru Tegh Bahadur gave his life for his Dharma of Tilak and Janeu – Guru Gobind Singh
Guru Nanak’s love for Janeu, Tilak, Yajna and Vedic Dharma was inherited by Guru Tegh Bahadur. Guru Gobind Singh writes in his Dasham Granth’s Bichatar Naatak-
तिलक जंजू राखा प्रभु ताका। कीनो बड़ो कलू महि साका।।
धरम हेत साका जिनी कीया। सीस दिया पर सिरर न दीया।।
Meaning – Guru Tegh Bahadur gave his head but kept Tilak and Janeu (sacred thread) for his Eeshvar. He did greatest work in Kaliyug for his Dharma. (Guru Gobind Singh doesn’t mention any weak Hindus or faith of Hindus here)
Who can match this greatest sacrifice for Dharma? Guru Tegh Bahadur was son of Vedic Dharma and he died protecting it. Of course, Guru died protecting Hindus because he himself and ALL Gurus were Hindus. Every son of faith worth his salt would give his head in return of Dharma. Guru Tegh Bahadur died for his mother faith- Vedic Dharma. Mother Dharma and all Hindus (includes real Sikhs) are extremely proud of her Balidani son.
Here is a beautiful Bhajan – Tilak Janju (Janeu) on these legendary lines by Guru Gobind Singh. Listen to this in background and keep reading.
Guru Gobind Singh used to wear Janeu/sacred thread
Panth Parkash – one of the most comprehensive works on Sikh history written by legendary historian Giani Gian Singh in 1880 describes Guru Gobind Singh on his day of marriage in following lines
Hindi –
पीत पुनीत उपरना धोती जोति नविय व छवि छाजै।
पीत जनेऊ मनो वदन सासि पै बिजरी भ्राजे।।
English – Guru Gobind Singh wore clean yellow Dhoti and yellow Janeu-Yajnopaveet/sacred thread at the time of wedding.
Majority of Guru Gobind Singh’s literature is reproduction of Hindu Puranas, Ramayan and Mahabharat in simple words for masses. All his life, he invoked Shakti, Devi & Shiva to destroy Turks/cow-killers. Read Dasham Granth if you don’t believe.
This love of Gurus for Janeu and Dharma is still alive in many Sikhs. Revolutionary Sardar Bhagat Singh (whose pictures communists carry these days for no reason) wrote in his tract ‘Why I am an atheist’ how his grandfather Sardar Arjan Singh – a staunch Sikh, follower of Vedas and Swami Dayanand – wore Janeu and performed daily Yajna. Bhagat Singh also remembers how he would chant Vedic Mantras for hours daily. Sardar Arjan Singh Ji also authored a book – “Guru Saheban Vedon ke Pairo the (Sikh Gurus were followers of Vedas)”.
There are thousands of instances of Sikh Gurus that prove they were followers of Vedic Dharma. I will bring more truth in upcoming articles on Gurus, their Vedic ancestry, Sikh philosophy, warriors and history that will counter the trash of distortion, separatism, extremism and lies.
Gurus conducted Yajnas, wore Janeu, died for Janeu, created army of Hindus for protection of Hindus. Sikh/Khalsa was army of the Hindus by the Hindus for the Hindus. First Sikhs of the world were the first sons of Hindu mothers. Remember when you take jibe of ‘we saved you/your women’ at any Hindu, you are insulting Hindu mother/father of Guru Nanak, Guru Gobind and all Gurus, your own mother, your entire clan and the mother who gave her first child f(or Khalsa Hindu Army) who later became your great grandfather. If Gurus are to be followed, a true Sikh has to be a true Hindu and vice versa.
What should a Sikh do? Follow Gurus. Guru Gobind Singh carried his mighty bow on one shoulder and Janeu on the other. Every Sikh who loves Gurus must carry both traditions on his shoulders. A tree remains green only till it’s connected with roots. Let’s remember this always.
Credits – Ms Vanit Nalwa (6th generation descendent of Sardar Gen Hari Singh Nalwa)
——-
About Author – Dr Vashi Sharma, studied at IITB, taught at IITK, Energy Science, Defence, Religions, history, Pakistan.
Twitter – @DharmaOfVedas
ਖਲੜੀ ਖਪਰੀ ਲਕੜੀ ਚਮੜੀ ਸਿਖਾ ਸੂਤੁ ਧੋਤੀ ਕੀਨ੍ਹ੍ਹੀ ॥ ਤੂੰ ਸਾਹਿਬੁ ਹਉ ਸਾਂਗੀ ਤੇਰਾ ਪ੍ਰਣਵੈ ਨਾਨਕੁ ਜਾਤਿ ਕੈਸੀ ॥੪॥੧॥੩੩॥ {ਪੰਨਾ 358}
Mr Vashi Sharma ,
Interpretation of above lines is not as stated in your article its whole meaning can only be considered when you read and understand entire sabhad as mentioned below :
मैं क्षमा चाहता हूं कि आपको इसे गुरमुखी में पढ़ना होगा
ਆਸਾ ਘਰੁ ੪ ਮਹਲਾ ੧ ੴ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ ॥ ਦੇਵਤਿਆ ਦਰਸਨ ਕੈ ਤਾਈ ਦੂਖ ਭੂਖ ਤੀਰਥ ਕੀਏ ॥ ਜੋਗੀ ਜਤੀ ਜੁਗਤਿ ਮਹਿ ਰਹਤੇ ਕਰਿ ਕਰਿ ਭਗਵੇ ਭੇਖ ਭਏ ॥੧॥ ਤਉ ਕਾਰਣਿ ਸਾਹਿਬਾ ਰੰਗਿ ਰਤੇ ॥ ਤੇਰੇ ਨਾਮ ਅਨੇਕਾ ਰੂਪ ਅਨੰਤਾ ਕਹਣੁ ਨ ਜਾਹੀ ਤੇਰੇ ਗੁਣ ਕੇਤੇ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ ਦਰ ਘਰ ਮਹਲਾ ਹਸਤੀ ਘੋੜੇ ਛੋਡਿ ਵਿਲਾਇਤਿ ਦੇਸ ਗਏ ॥ ਪੀਰ ਪੇਕਾਂਬਰ ਸਾਲਿਕ ਸਾਦਿਕ ਛੋਡੀ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਥਾਇ ਪਏ ॥੨॥ ਸਾਦ ਸਹਜ ਸੁਖ ਰਸ ਕਸ ਤਜੀਅਲੇ ਕਾਪੜ ਛੋਡੇ ਚਮੜ ਲੀਏ ॥ ਦੁਖੀਏ ਦਰਦਵੰਦ ਦਰਿ ਤੇਰੈ ਨਾਮਿ ਰਤੇ ਦਰਵੇਸ ਭਏ ॥੩॥ ਖਲੜੀ ਖਪਰੀ ਲਕੜੀ ਚਮੜੀ ਸਿਖਾ ਸੂਤੁ ਧੋਤੀ ਕੀਨ੍ਹ੍ਹੀ ॥ ਤੂੰ ਸਾਹਿਬੁ ਹਉ ਸਾਂਗੀ ਤੇਰਾ ਪ੍ਰਣਵੈ ਨਾਨਕੁ ਜਾਤਿ ਕੈਸੀ ॥੪॥੧॥੩੩॥ {ਪੰਨਾ 358}
ਨੋਟ: ‘ਘਰੁ 4’ ਦਾ ਇਹ ਇਕੋ ਹੀ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਹੈ।
ਪਦ ਅਰਥ: ਕੈ ਤਾਈ = ਦੀ ਖ਼ਾਤਰ। ਜੁਗਤਿ = ਮਰਯਾਦਾ। ਭਗਵੇ = ਗੇਰੂਏ ਰੰਗ ਦੇ।1।
ਤਉ ਕਾਰਣਿ = ਤੇਰੇ ਦੀਦਾਰ ਦੀ ਖ਼ਾਤਰ। ਰੰਗਿ = (ਤੇਰੇ) ਪ੍ਰੇਮ ਵਿਚ। ਕਹਣੁ ਨ ਜਾਹੀ = ਕਹਣੁ ਨ ਜਾਹਿ, ਬਿਆਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤੇ ਜਾ ਸਕਦੇ।1। ਰਹਾਉ।
ਮਹਲਾ = ਮਹਲ-ਮਾੜੀਆਂ। ਹਸਤੀ = ਹਾਥੀ। ਛੋਡਿ = ਛੱਡ ਕੇ। ਵਿਲਾਇਤਿ = ਵਤਨ। ਸਾਲਿਕ = ਗਿਆਨਵਾਨ, ਹੋਰਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਜੀਵਨ-ਰਾਹ ਦੱਸਣ ਵਾਲੇ। ਸਾਦਿਕ = ਸਿਦਕੀ। ਥਾਇ ਪਏ = ਕਬੂਲ ਹੋਣ ਵਾਸਤੇ।2।
ਸਹਜ = ਆਰਾਮ। ਰਸ ਕਸ = ਸਭ ਸੁਆਦਾਂ ਦੇ ਪਦਾਰਥ। ਤਜੀਅਲੇ = ਤਿਆਗ ਦਿੱਤੇ। ਦਰਿ ਤੇਰੈ = ਤੇਰੇ ਦਰਵਾਜ਼ੇ ਉਤੇ। ਦਰਵੇਸ = ਫ਼ਕੀਰ।3।
ਖਲੜੀ = ਭੰਗ ਆਦਿਕ ਪਾਣ ਲਈ ਚਮੜੇ ਦੀ ਝੋਲੀ। ਲਕੜੀ = ਡੰਡਾ। ਸਿਖਾ = ਬੋਦੀ। ਸੂਤੁ = ਜਨੇਊ। ਜਾਤਿ ਕੈਸੀ = ਮੈਨੂੰ ਕਿਸੇ ਜਾਤ ਦਾ ਮਾਣ ਨਹੀਂ।4।
ਅਰਥ: ਹੇ ਮੇਰੇ ਮਾਲਿਕ! ਤੈਨੂੰ ਮਿਲਣ ਲਈ ਅਨੇਕਾਂ ਬੰਦੇ ਤੇਰੇ ਪਿਆਰ ਵਿਚ ਰੰਗੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਤੇਰੇ ਅਨੇਕਾਂ ਨਾਮ ਹਨ, ਤੇਰੇ ਬੇਅੰਤ ਰੂਪ ਹਨ, ਤੇਰੇ ਬੇਅੰਤ ਹੀ ਗੁਣ ਹਨ, ਕਿਸੇ ਭੀ ਪਾਸੋਂ ਬਿਆਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤੇ ਜਾ ਸਕਦੇ।1। ਰਹਾਉ।
ਦੇਵਤਿਆਂ ਨੇ ਭੀ ਤੇਰਾ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਦੁੱਖ ਸਹਾਰੇ, ਭੁੱਖਾਂ ਸਹਾਰੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਤੀਰਥ-ਰਟਨ ਕੀਤੇ। ਅਨੇਕਾਂ ਜੋਗੀ ਤੇ ਜਤੀ (ਆਪੋ ਆਪਣੀ) ਮਰਯਾਦਾ ਵਿਚ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹੋਏ ਗੇਰੂਏ ਰੰਗ ਦੇ ਕੱਪੜੇ ਪਾਂਦੇ ਰਹੇ।1।
(ਤੇਰਾ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਹੀ ਰਾਜ-ਮਿਲਖ ਦੇ ਮਾਲਿਕ) ਆਪਣੇ ਮਹਲ-ਮਾੜੀਆਂ ਆਪਣੇ ਘਰ-ਬੂਹੇ ਹਾਥੀ ਘੋੜੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਦੇਸ ਵਤਨ ਛੱਡ ਕੇ (ਜੰਗਲੀਂ) ਚਲੇ ਗਏ ਅਨੇਕਾਂ ਪੀਰਾਂ ਪੈਗ਼ੰਬਰਾਂ ਗਿਆਨਵਾਨਾਂ ਤੇ ਸਿਦਕੀਆਂ ਨੇ ਤੇਰੇ ਦਰ ਤੇ ਕਬੂਲ ਹੋਣ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਛੱਡੀ।2।
ਅਨੇਕਾਂ ਬੰਦਿਆਂ ਨੇ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਦੇ ਸੁਆਦ ਸੁਖ ਆਰਾਮ ਤੇ ਸਭ ਰਸਾਂ ਦੇ ਪਦਾਰਥ ਛੱਡੇ, ਕੱਪੜੇ ਛੱਡ ਕੇ ਚਮੜਾ ਪਹਿਨਿਆ। ਅਨੇਕਾਂ ਬੰਦੇ ਦੁਖੀਆਂ ਵਾਂਗ ਦਰਦਵੰਦਾਂ ਵਾਂਗ ਤੇਰੇ ਦਰ ਤੇ ਫ਼ਰਿਆਦ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਤੇਰੇ ਨਾਮ ਵਿਚ ਰੰਗੇ ਰਹਿਣ ਲਈ (ਗ੍ਰਿਹਸਤ ਛੱਡ ਕੇ) ਫ਼ਕੀਰ ਹੋ ਗਏ।3।
ਕਿਸੇ ਨੇ (ਭੰਗ ਆਦਿਕ ਪਾਣ ਲਈ) ਚੰਮ ਦੀ ਝੋਲੀ ਲੈ ਲਈ, ਕਿਸੇ ਨੇ (ਘਰ ਘਰ ਮੰਗਣ ਲਈ) ਖੱਪਰ (ਹੱਥ ਵਿਚ) ਫੜ ਲਿਆ, ਕੋਈ ਡੰਡਾ-ਧਾਰੀ ਸੰਨਿਆਸੀ ਬਣਿਆ, ਕਿਸੇ ਨੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਗ-ਛਾਲਾ ਲੈ ਲਈ, ਕੋਈ ਬੋਦੀ ਜਨੇਊ ਤੇ ਧੋਤੀ ਦਾ ਧਾਰਨੀ ਹੋਇਆ। ਪਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ– ਹੇ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ! ਤੂੰ ਮੇਰਾ ਮਾਲਿਕ ਹੈਂ, ਮੈਂ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਤੇਰਾ ਸਾਂਗੀ ਹਾਂ (ਭਾਵ, ਮੈਂ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਤੇਰਾ ਅਖਵਾਂਦਾ ਹਾਂ, ਜਿਵੇਂ ਤੂੰ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਰੱਖਦਾ ਹੈਂ ਤਿਵੇਂ ਹੀ ਰਹਿੰਦਾ ਹਾਂ) ਕਿਸੇ ਖ਼ਾਸ ਸ਼੍ਰੇਣੀ ਵਿਚ ਹੋਣ ਦਾ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਕੋਈ ਮਾਣ ਨਹੀਂ।4।1। 33।
Mr. Khalistani,
You have no place to hide now. Accept defeat. No point in complicating the straightforward.
Or else get out of my sacred Sanatan Dharmic Bharat.
Well Written and well researched article. The more I study the glorious words of the Gurus the more I come to the conclusion that Sikhism is a beautiful branch of ancient Vedic religion.
Thanks for this article, clearly rejecting the myths and false propoganda.
All a bunch of lies , part of hindutva’s grand plan of assimilation of sikhism into hinduism.
The need to assimilate sikhism into hinduism once and forever is for 2 reasons :
1) monopoly and dominance of hinduism over dharmic faiths and Indian subcontinent
2) When time comes to make hindu rashtra, muslims can be conveniently brushed off since they got pakistan , but Sikhs put all faith in India . Hence their demands will also have to be set. to avoid so , its better if sikhism becomes a sect of hinduism once and forever.
WHOLE WORLD recognizes sikhism as a religion and rightly so . Lies can only work for so long.
BTW, since you talked of Sikhism and Janeu, Guru Nanak himself refused to wear Janeu in childhood during his Yagyopavita ceremony, so there’s no question of Guru Nanak or Guru Gobind Singh wearing Janeu . And Guru Gobind Singh ji wore knee length kachhera just like nihangs , not dhoti
All just a bunch of lies
Guru Nanak’s golden words are forever inscribed in Guru Granth sahib about janeu/dhoti :
ਆਸਾ ਮਹਲਾ ੧ ॥
आसा महला १ ॥
Aasaa, First Mehl:
ਕਾਇਆ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਮਨੁ ਹੈ ਧੋਤੀ ॥
काइआ ब्रहमा मनु है धोती ॥
Let the body be the Brahmin, and let the mind be the loin-cloth;
ਗਿਆਨੁ ਜਨੇਊ ਧਿਆਨੁ ਕੁਸਪਾਤੀ ॥
गिआनु जनेऊ धिआनु कुसपाती ॥
let spiritual wisdom be the sacred thread, and meditation the ceremonial ring.
ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮਾ ਜਸੁ ਜਾਚਉ ਨਾਉ ॥
हरि नामा जसु जाचउ नाउ ॥
I seek the Name of the Lord and His Praise as my cleansing bath.
ਗੁਰ ਪਰਸਾਦੀ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਿ ਸਮਾਉ ॥੧॥
गुर परसादी ब्रहमि समाउ ॥१॥
By Guru’s Grace, I am absorbed into God. ||1||
Guru Nanak refused to wear Janeu and instead told pandit to give him janeu made of ‘sat kapaah’ (eternal true cotton) which pandit obviously didn’t have . This incident is mentioned in Guru granth sahib
ਨੰਗਾ ਦੋਜਕਿ ਚਾਲਿਆ ਤਾ ਦਿਸੈ ਖਰਾ ਡਰਾਵਣਾ ॥
नंगा दोजकि चालिआ ता दिसै खरा डरावणा ॥
Nangā ḏojak cẖāli▫ā ṯā ḏisai kẖarā darāvaṇā.
He goes to hell naked, and he looks hideous then.
ਕਰਿ ਅਉਗਣ ਪਛੋਤਾਵਣਾ ॥੧੪॥
करि अउगण पछोतावणा ॥१४॥
Kar a▫ugaṇ pacẖẖoṯāvaṇā. ||14||
He regrets the sins he committed. ||14||
ਸਲੋਕੁ ਮਃ ੧ ॥
सलोकु मः १ ॥
Shalok, First Mehl:
ਦਇਆ ਕਪਾਹ ਸੰਤੋਖੁ ਸੂਤੁ ਜਤੁ ਗੰਢੀ ਸਤੁ ਵਟੁ ॥
दइआ कपाह संतोखु सूतु जतु गंढी सतु वटु ॥
Make compassion the cotton, contentment the thread, modesty the knot and truth the twist.
ਏਹੁ ਜਨੇਊ ਜੀਅ ਕਾ ਹਈ ਤ ਪਾਡੇ ਘਤੁ ॥
एहु जनेऊ जीअ का हई त पाडे घतु ॥
This is the sacred thread of the soul; if you have it, then go ahead and put it on me.
ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਤੁਟੈ ਨ ਮਲੁ ਲਗੈ ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਜਲੈ ਨ ਜਾਇ ॥
ना एहु तुटै न मलु लगै ना एहु जलै न जाइ ॥
It does not break, it cannot be soiled by filth, it cannot be burnt, or lost.
ਧੰਨੁ ਸੁ ਮਾਣਸ ਨਾਨਕਾ ਜੋ ਗਲਿ ਚਲੇ ਪਾਇ ॥
धंनु सु माणस नानका जो गलि चले पाइ ॥
Blessed are those mortal beings, O Nanak, who wear such a thread around their necks.
ਚਉਕੜਿ ਮੁਲਿ ਅਣਾਇਆ ਬਹਿ ਚਉਕੈ ਪਾਇਆ ॥
चउकड़ि मुलि अणाइआ बहि चउकै पाइआ ॥
You buy the thread for a few shells, and seated in your enclosure, you put it on.
ਸਿਖਾ ਕੰਨਿ ਚੜਾਈਆ ਗੁਰੁ ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਣੁ ਥਿਆ ॥
सिखा कंनि चड़ाईआ गुरु ब्राहमणु थिआ ॥
Whispering instructions into others’ ears, the Brahmin becomes a guru.
ਓਹੁ ਮੁਆ ਓਹੁ ਝੜਿ ਪਇਆ ਵੇਤਗਾ ਗਇਆ ॥੧॥
ओहु मुआ ओहु झड़ि पइआ वेतगा गइआ ॥१॥
But he dies, and the sacred thread falls away, and the soul departs without it. ||1||
Lies only work for so long !
Guru Nanak was a Lohana, surname Chandarana. Hence, a Hindu not a Sikh and proud descendant of Hindus. He didn’t give up his surname, his so-called followers have. WHY do they lie? Lohanas had been resisting Mughal invaders since centuries. The ups and downs of history should be read objectively bearing in mind that none are actual interviews of the original people. Theyre usually rewritten versions probably full of errors. For eg: the 5 Ks are a uniform. So at the time they decided to form army officially they probably mentioned those items. Otherwise there’s nothing new about wearing knickers, combing hair, wearing kada/bracelets, having turbans, beards. Many other clans did the same. Even Sanyasis in those days were warrior monks which is why they carried danda or lathi. But people have forgotten that aspect of sanyas dharma and only see danda as a symbol. Sikhs today need to stop being rigid cherrypicking random bits from history to be unreasonable and demean other Hindus to booste their fragile ego. If they’re so into it, why don’t they train to be warriors to fight Muslim invaders like their ancestors? Why mangle the concept of ancient army into one of religion? What is purpose? Is it for some monetary benefits? Play minorities politics?
Some today wrongly say that their gurus rejected Hinduism and formed separate religion due to their whatever imaginary reasons. They mention random incidents of betrayals etc. Even if these did happen it wasn’t a Hindu betraying a Sikh, but a Hindu betraying a Hindu due to their whatever agenda, not because of their religious beliefs. There are incidents of Sikhs betraying Hindus too. They played politics just like people do today and all people world over will continue to do forever as is the way of the species.
You are actually proving what author has written. There is no Hindu conspiracy it is problem with your upbringing which takes Dharam as politics of identity. Hindus are never concerned with identity and are not narrow minded.. we are absolutely at peace with ever Dharmic faith from Africa to Amazon the only issue for us is totalitarian ideologies like Islam and Christianity to whom Sikhs now a days want to follow. In order to prove Sikhism akin to the abrahmic concept of one book one prophet, you will kill the spirit of Dharma and betray all the Gurus just like Banda Bairagi was betrayed by self proclaimed righteous akali Sikhs
What you have written here has already been answered in the article. Please read rather than regurgitating your bias..
Who were their parents? Hindus or Sikhs?
😂😂😂😂 the references that you gave further prove how important janeu is in Sikhism. You basically made a fool of yourself. Just re-read the verses that you have shared. If you still don’t get it, then get the fuck out of my country Khalistani Gaddaar. But thanks for the references though😂😂😂
Vasi jee,
Thank you for this precious knowledge.
what knowledge . even a cursory reading of Guru Granth sahib would have proven this guy wrong
It’s not a deep study at all. Guru Nanak refused to wear janeu in his childhood janeu ceremony .
This incident is even mentioned in Guru Granth sahib. None of the gurus wore janeu
ਸਲੋਕੁ ਮਃ ੧ ॥
सलोकु मः १ ॥
Shalok, First Mehl:
ਦਇਆ ਕਪਾਹ ਸੰਤੋਖੁ ਸੂਤੁ ਜਤੁ ਗੰਢੀ ਸਤੁ ਵਟੁ ॥
दइआ कपाह संतोखु सूतु जतु गंढी सतु वटु ॥
Make compassion the cotton, contentment the thread, modesty the knot and truth the twist.
ਏਹੁ ਜਨੇਊ ਜੀਅ ਕਾ ਹਈ ਤ ਪਾਡੇ ਘਤੁ ॥
एहु जनेऊ जीअ का हई त पाडे घतु ॥
This is the sacred thread of the soul; if you have it, then go ahead and put it on me.
ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਤੁਟੈ ਨ ਮਲੁ ਲਗੈ ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਜਲੈ ਨ ਜਾਇ ॥
ना एहु तुटै न मलु लगै ना एहु जलै न जाइ ॥
It does not break, it cannot be soiled by filth, it cannot be burnt, or lost.
ਧੰਨੁ ਸੁ ਮਾਣਸ ਨਾਨਕਾ ਜੋ ਗਲਿ ਚਲੇ ਪਾਇ ॥
धंनु सु माणस नानका जो गलि चले पाइ ॥
Blessed are those mortal beings, O Nanak, who wear such a thread around their necks.
😂😂😂Where does any of these verses say that he is rejecting the sacred thread? In fact he is adding more significance to the sacred thread here. Dear Khalistani your brain is Khaali. Read the verses again. 😂😂😂
truth shall prevail. thank you so much for providing us such hidden treasures. i heard from my sikh friend that there is 108 nMes of Bhagwan Vishnu in hola mahlla and many more things.
what truth . even a cursory reading of Guru Granth sahib would have proven this guy wrong
It’s not a deep study at all. Guru Nanak refused to wear janeu in his childhood janeu ceremony .
This incident is even mentioned in Guru Granth sahib. None of the gurus wore janeu
ਸਲੋਕੁ ਮਃ ੧ ॥
सलोकु मः १ ॥
Shalok, First Mehl:
ਦਇਆ ਕਪਾਹ ਸੰਤੋਖੁ ਸੂਤੁ ਜਤੁ ਗੰਢੀ ਸਤੁ ਵਟੁ ॥
दइआ कपाह संतोखु सूतु जतु गंढी सतु वटु ॥
Make compassion the cotton, contentment the thread, modesty the knot and truth the twist.
ਏਹੁ ਜਨੇਊ ਜੀਅ ਕਾ ਹਈ ਤ ਪਾਡੇ ਘਤੁ ॥
एहु जनेऊ जीअ का हई त पाडे घतु ॥
This is the sacred thread of the soul; if you have it, then go ahead and put it on me.
ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਤੁਟੈ ਨ ਮਲੁ ਲਗੈ ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਜਲੈ ਨ ਜਾਇ ॥
ना एहु तुटै न मलु लगै ना एहु जलै न जाइ ॥
It does not break, it cannot be soiled by filth, it cannot be burnt, or lost.
ਧੰਨੁ ਸੁ ਮਾਣਸ ਨਾਨਕਾ ਜੋ ਗਲਿ ਚਲੇ ਪਾਇ ॥
धंनु सु माणस नानका जो गलि चले पाइ ॥
Blessed are those mortal beings, O Nanak, who wear such a thread around their necks.
😂😂😂😂 Sab Fake. First read the bani of Gurus then re read what you’ve written. Dear visitors don’t blindly believe this article. I am a Hindu born who is blessed to learn and practice sikhi. Im gonna be converting to Sikh too. With my experience I can say what the person has written above is what all hindus think untill the realise what sikhi is. It’s all a misbelief injected inside today’s population by government. Sikhs are not a branch of hindus. Hindus are a branch of Sikhs. Read the sachi bani of Waheguru and then re read this article.
P.S Don’t just blindly believe internet read articles. Guru Sahib never worn janeu. Guru nanak Sahib was born in a Hindu family and he denied the wear the janeu because it had no real significance to him.
Except for your beautiful DP, everything is fake. You are right. Hindus are a branch of Sikhs. Similarly, you are grandfather and your grandfather is your grandson.
मैक सिख आ गया 😂😂😂
People can choose not to wear janeo for various reasons. That doesn’t imply they reject the philosophy behind it. That is the purpose of this article.
Brother you’re contradicting yourself 😂 First you say Hindus are a branch of Sikhs and then you say Guru Nanak Dev Ji was born in a Hindu family. Kehna kya chahte ho?
Sharma ji , So deep study done by you on this topic. So much clarification. Kudos
It’s not a deep study at all. Guru Nanak refused to wear janeu in his childhood janeu ceremony .
This incident is even mentioned in Guru Granth sahib. None of the gurus wore janeu
ਸਲੋਕੁ ਮਃ ੧ ॥
सलोकु मः १ ॥
Shalok, First Mehl:
ਦਇਆ ਕਪਾਹ ਸੰਤੋਖੁ ਸੂਤੁ ਜਤੁ ਗੰਢੀ ਸਤੁ ਵਟੁ ॥
दइआ कपाह संतोखु सूतु जतु गंढी सतु वटु ॥
Make compassion the cotton, contentment the thread, modesty the knot and truth the twist.
ਏਹੁ ਜਨੇਊ ਜੀਅ ਕਾ ਹਈ ਤ ਪਾਡੇ ਘਤੁ ॥
एहु जनेऊ जीअ का हई त पाडे घतु ॥
This is the sacred thread of the soul; if you have it, then go ahead and put it on me.
ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਤੁਟੈ ਨ ਮਲੁ ਲਗੈ ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਜਲੈ ਨ ਜਾਇ ॥
ना एहु तुटै न मलु लगै ना एहु जलै न जाइ ॥
It does not break, it cannot be soiled by filth, it cannot be burnt, or lost.
ਧੰਨੁ ਸੁ ਮਾਣਸ ਨਾਨਕਾ ਜੋ ਗਲਿ ਚਲੇ ਪਾਇ ॥
धंनु सु माणस नानका जो गलि चले पाइ ॥
Blessed are those mortal beings, O Nanak, who wear such a thread around their necks.
This is not a physical janeu
Fake article promoted by Hindus.
What is fake, elaborate… Or you want to say Sikh came from Planet Mars to save Hindus
We would have even saved muslims if they were being oppressed by hindus. If u wanna have a discussion go visit budha dal , they will teach u real sikhi , but u are too afraid to meet real Sikhs because u can only spread false propaganda online , bunch of scared people
Do you know who is called Govind in Hinduism? It’s Krishna. Do you know who is Arjan (Arjun)? He is someone from Mahabharat. Remember? Just look at the names if you can’t look at your history. Please it’s a request
So it means you accept that he used to wear Janeu, whether it was physical or Not…
Typical Brahminical Cancerous Virus propaganda with complete distortion of facts and texts. If this Mr/Ms. Sharma is so true and brave enough then he/she must openly face Sikh intellectuals.
Nicely written
Thank you for your deep research. Although we know the contribution of the Sikh community and their history and emergence. But this article was needed to shut those mouths that try to create separatism between Hindus and Sikhs. And for those Sikhs who say they are not Hindus, you are constitutionally also, Hindus. Go and read the definition. Just because someone’s son has chosen a different path doesn’t mean his father changes. People can choose to fight their battles differently.
Deep research??? More like 0 research banda just twisted the real meanings , poorly translated the texts
Very enlightening article
Superb research